Fire works

5 07 2009

The following is two things:  A backlash from reading too much Sayers, and an incredibly delightful bit of verbally misogynist hopscotch.


– – – – –

If equanimity be king and commonality supreme,

Then earth itself leaves me disgusted; the existential sheen has rusted.

For if the chauvinist cannot demand a meal piping hot

Of the hands of his fair lass, marriage time has surely passed.

I dreamed a dream of days gone by and seasons past in which the I

Trumped the We most every time and silenced dear Evangeline.

For if the pig-head man can see a lure within matrimony

Suffragettes must yet be suffered to keep filling man’s bare cupboard

With sundries, meats and fatty foods to better alter dour moods.

If man hath no baseless dominion o’er the fairer sex of women

Then few and far between shall be men possessed of wives-to-be.

(How often must this concept vex she who seeks to marry Rex!)

And down must go her expectations of the status of her station,

For though man certainly knows not of how to serve or prepare aught

Yet there remain these obligations for she who will pour libations

Of her dignity and grace on altars of white wedding lace.

We do not say it’s fair to her or that these duties are deserved

But we admittedly say little with our mouths stuffed so with Skittles.




4 responses

5 07 2009

good thing I didn’t read this before August 2007.

5 07 2009

Touche Jan. Touche.

The main thing I’m trying to get across in this satire (ala Ben Franklin, just 100 times less skillful) is the implicit attitude of the real chauvinists. Such an attitude much eventually come to rest upon the chauvinist’s own animal appetites overshadowing any sort of reason.

To put it simply, the men who would take such a view seriously would be insulting themselves by their agreement with this disgusting sentiment far more than they would be insulting women, who need not deign to give such idiotic views the time of day.

Have I mentioned how much I love you lately? ‘Cause I do.

7 07 2009

No worries….I guess I could not, for once, follow your train of thought. How unusual as we are generally on the same plain or plane, or plantain, as it were. Have you read/seen David Sedaris? Love you too…….xoxoxoxoxo jet

8 07 2009

Neither, only heard of him. Intriguing things, to say the least.

I’d take his 7 million + books sold thing any day, though…

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: